Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom

cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

part: a version: - update: *

VendorRedhat (e942785a-ca89-506e-bd99-50782639cde3)
ProductMigration Toolkit For Runtimes (be609849-df5a-54ad-bc34-e2b4f5fa6751)
Edition*
Language*
Software edition*
Target software*
Target hardware*
Other*
NotesImported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed

PURL mappings

PURLSourceLast updated
No PURL mappings for this CPE yet.

Vulnerability references

IdentifiercpeApplicabilitySubmitteddb.gcve.eu detailsRationale
CVE:CVE-2024-1132 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:25:39.330720 Keycloak: path transversal in redirection validation
HIGH (8.1)
A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL.
Published: 2024-04-17T13:21:19.130Z
Updated: 2026-05-16T23:26:21.991Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-1664 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:52:36.473915 Details available
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable.
Published: 2023-05-26T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-01-15T21:34:51.378Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2022-4492 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:51:59.610717 Details available
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
Published: 2023-02-23T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-03-12T14:34:50.123Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

Contribute

You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.