Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Runtimes -
Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
part: a version: - update: *
| Vendor | Redhat (e942785a-ca89-506e-bd99-50782639cde3) |
|---|---|
| Product | Migration Toolkit For Runtimes (be609849-df5a-54ad-bc34-e2b4f5fa6751) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
| Notes | Imported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed |
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
| No PURL mappings for this CPE yet. | ||
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2024-1132 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 06:25:39.330720 |
Keycloak: path transversal in redirection validation
HIGH (8.1)
A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL.
Published: 2024-04-17T13:21:19.130Z
Updated: 2026-05-16T23:26:21.991Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2023-1664 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:52:36.473915 |
Details available
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable.
Published: 2023-05-26T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-01-15T21:34:51.378Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2022-4492 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:51:59.610717 |
Details available
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
Published: 2023-02-23T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-03-12T14:34:50.123Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.