OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.1.0a
Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.1.0a:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
part: a version: 1.1.0a update: *
| Vendor | Openssl (1e7bcbe3-aabe-50a4-8853-ff7f6ce8bd02) |
|---|---|
| Product | Openssl (3ac33f6d-3ea6-5807-a2fa-788d3707f5b1) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
| Notes | Imported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed |
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
pkg:deb/debian/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045529 |
pkg:deb/ubuntu/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045530 |
pkg:github/openssl/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045532 |
pkg:rpm/centos/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045533 |
pkg:rpm/fedora/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045535 |
pkg:rpm/opensuse/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045536 |
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2017-3738 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.160709 |
Details available
There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository.
Published: 2017-12-07T16:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T18:34:25.955Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3735 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.152425 |
Details available
While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. This bug has been present since 2006 and is present in all versions of OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0g.
Published: 2017-08-28T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T21:08:28.987Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3733 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.081776 |
Encrypt-Then-Mac renegotiation crash
During a renegotiation handshake if the Encrypt-Then-Mac extension is negotiated where it was not in the original handshake (or vice-versa) then this can cause OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0e to crash (dependent on ciphersuite). Both clients and servers are affected.
Published: 2017-05-04T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T16:18:03.381Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3732 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.081231 |
BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64
There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.
Published: 2017-05-04T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T22:08:37.371Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3731 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.068710 |
Truncated packet could crash via OOB read
If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k.
Published: 2017-05-04T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T22:40:54.865Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3730 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.055311 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-7054 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:11.673624 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-7053 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:11.672003 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-6309 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:59.443304 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.