OpenSSL 1.1.0
Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
part: a version: 1.1.0 update: *
| Vendor | Openssl (1e7bcbe3-aabe-50a4-8853-ff7f6ce8bd02) |
|---|---|
| Product | Openssl (3ac33f6d-3ea6-5807-a2fa-788d3707f5b1) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
| Notes | Imported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed |
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
pkg:deb/debian/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045512 |
pkg:deb/ubuntu/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045514 |
pkg:github/openssl/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045515 |
pkg:rpm/centos/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045517 |
pkg:rpm/fedora/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045518 |
pkg:rpm/opensuse/openssl |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:18:23.045520 |
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2021-4044 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:38:08.201273 |
Invalid handling of X509_verify_cert() internal errors in libssl
Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL 3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains. By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0).
Published: 2021-12-14T18:40:11.901Z
Updated: 2024-09-17T03:17:39.603Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3738 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.160692 |
Details available
There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository.
Published: 2017-12-07T16:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T18:34:25.955Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3735 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.152396 |
Details available
While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. This bug has been present since 2006 and is present in all versions of OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0g.
Published: 2017-08-28T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T21:08:28.987Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3733 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.081755 |
Encrypt-Then-Mac renegotiation crash
During a renegotiation handshake if the Encrypt-Then-Mac extension is negotiated where it was not in the original handshake (or vice-versa) then this can cause OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0e to crash (dependent on ciphersuite). Both clients and servers are affected.
Published: 2017-05-04T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T16:18:03.381Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3730 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:36.054414 |
Bad (EC)DHE parameters cause a client crash
In OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d, if a malicious server supplies bad parameters for a DHE or ECDHE key exchange then this can result in the client attempting to dereference a NULL pointer leading to a client crash. This could be exploited in a Denial of Service attack.
Published: 2017-05-04T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T17:48:53.722Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-8610 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:14.439634 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-7054 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:11.673599 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-7053 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:11.671418 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-6308 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:59.441097 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-6307 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:59.440683 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-6305 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:59.430388 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-6304 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:59.424749 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.