Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:thekelleys:dnsmasq:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*part: a version: * update: *
| Vendor | Thekelleys (2b401865-b44d-5460-8982-05bf0b551d92) |
|---|---|
| Product | Dnsmasq (dd61cf97-cadb-5769-bf49-db575863c2d6) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
Notes
Imported from purl2cpe mapping
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
pkg:deb/debian/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523390 |
pkg:deb/ubuntu/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523394 |
pkg:github/dnsfilter/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523397 |
pkg:github/guns/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523400 |
pkg:github/powerdns/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523403 |
pkg:gitlab/redhat/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523406 |
pkg:rpm/fedora/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523409 |
pkg:rpm/opensuse/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523412 |
pkg:thekelleys/dnsmasq |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:11:34.523415 |
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2023-50387 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 06:16:16.106437 |
Details available
Certain DNSSEC aspects of the DNS protocol (in RFC 4033, 4034, 4035, 6840, and related RFCs) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via one or more DNSSEC responses, aka the "KeyTrap" issue. One of the concerns is that, when there is a zone with many DNSKEY and RRSIG records, the protocol specification implies that an algorithm must evaluate all combinations of DNSKEY and RRSIG records.
Published: 2024-02-14T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-11-04T18:20:34.949Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2023-28450 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 06:01:10.900905 |
Details available
An issue was discovered in Dnsmasq before 2.90. The default maximum EDNS.0 UDP packet size was set to 4096 but should be 1232 because of DNS Flag Day 2020.
Published: 2023-03-15T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-11-03T21:47:37.596Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2022-0934 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:39:11.511670 |
Details available
A single-byte, non-arbitrary write/use-after-free flaw was found in dnsmasq. This flaw allows an attacker who sends a crafted packet processed by dnsmasq, potentially causing a denial of service.
Published: 2022-08-29T14:03:02.000Z
Updated: 2025-11-03T21:45:45.666Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2021-3448 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:33:52.055027 |
Details available
A flaw was found in dnsmasq in versions before 2.85. When configured to use a specific server for a given network interface, dnsmasq uses a fixed port while forwarding queries. An attacker on the network, able to find the outgoing port used by dnsmasq, only needs to guess the random transmission ID to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This flaw makes a DNS Cache Poisoning attack much easier. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
Published: 2021-04-08T22:06:45.000Z
Updated: 2025-12-03T00:40:40.220Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25687 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.198292 |
Details available
A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. This flaw allows a remote attacker, who can create valid DNS replies, to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code execute memcpy() with a negative size in sort_rrset() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Published: 2021-01-20T16:31:41.000Z
Updated: 2025-11-04T19:12:15.417Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25686 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.197288 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25685 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.196615 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25684 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.195956 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25683 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.195254 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25682 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.194598 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25681 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.193533 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2019-14834 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:12:56.192305 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2019-14513 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:12:54.927563 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-15107 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:57.923890 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-14496 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:50.050006 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-14495 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:50.042301 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-14494 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:50.041454 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-14493 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:50.040513 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-14492 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:50.039659 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-14491 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:50.015979 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-13704 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:48.769660 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2015-8899 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:05.718017 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2013-0198 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:03:45.776801 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2012-3411 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:02:09.649297 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2009-2958 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 04:51:31.568479 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2009-2957 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 04:51:31.530692 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2005-0877 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 04:48:13.878205 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.
Inspect record JSON
Open this panel to browse, search, copy or download the JSON record.