Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom

cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

part: a version: * update: *

VendorSigstore (534c4401-0625-5be2-ae9b-f6c1539e71bc)
ProductCosign (47b3b7a8-7deb-52a0-b40f-0f8d6514301d)
Edition*
Language*
Software edition*
Target software*
Target hardware*
Other*
NotesImported from purl2cpe mapping

PURL mappings

PURLSourceLast updated
pkg:github/rohankumardubey/cosign purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:15:40.674209
pkg:github/sigstore/cosign purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:15:40.674211
pkg:rpm/opensuse/cosign purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:15:40.674213

Vulnerability references

IdentifiercpeApplicabilitySubmitteddb.gcve.eu detailsRationale
CVE:CVE-2026-39395 vulnerable 2026-06-08 08:01:16.448973 Cosign's verify-blob-attestation reports false positive when payload parsing fails
MEDIUM (4.3)
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to 3.0.6 and 2.6.3, cosign verify-blob-attestation may erroneously report a "Verified OK" result for attestations with malformed payloads or mismatched predicate types. For old-format bundles and detached signatures, this was due to a logic flaw in the error handling of the predicate type validation. For new-format bundles, the predicate type validation was bypassed completely. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.6 and 2.6.3.
Published: 2026-04-07T20:06:28.798Z
Updated: 2026-04-08T15:49:16.587Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2026-24122 vulnerable 2026-06-08 07:51:17.158019 Cosign Certificate Chain Expiry Validation Issue Allows Issuing Certificate Expiry to Be Overlooked
LOW (3.7)
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. In versions 3.0.4 and below, an issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during verification even if the provided timestamp would mean the issuing certificate should be considered expired. When verifying artifact signatures using a certificate, Cosign first verifies the certificate chain using the leaf certificate's "not before" timestamp and later checks expiry of the leaf certificate using either a signed timestamp provided by the Rekor transparency log or from a timestamp authority, or using the current time. The root and all issuing certificates are assumed to be valid during the leaf certificate's validity. There is no impact to users of the public Sigstore infrastructure. This may affect private deployments with customized PKIs. This issue has been fixed in version 3.0.5.
Published: 2026-02-19T22:27:08.828Z
Updated: 2026-02-20T15:41:03.939Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2026-22703 vulnerable 2026-06-08 07:51:13.641429 Cosign verification accepts any valid Rekor entry under certain conditions
MEDIUM (5.5)
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to versions 2.6.2 and 3.0.4, Cosign bundle can be crafted to successfully verify an artifact even if the embedded Rekor entry does not reference the artifact's digest, signature or public key. When verifying a Rekor entry, Cosign verifies the Rekor entry signature, and also compares the artifact's digest, the user's public key from either a Fulcio certificate or provided by the user, and the artifact signature to the Rekor entry contents. Without these comparisons, Cosign would accept any response from Rekor as valid. A malicious actor that has compromised a user's identity or signing key could construct a valid Cosign bundle by including any arbitrary Rekor entry, thus preventing the user from being able to audit the signing event. This issue has been patched in versions 2.6.2 and 3.0.4.
Published: 2026-01-10T06:11:09.426Z
Updated: 2026-01-12T16:43:57.302Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2024-29903 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:33:29.518955 Cosign vulnerable to machine-wide denial of service via malicious artifacts
MEDIUM (4.2)
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates. The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.
Published: 2024-04-10T22:30:50.890Z
Updated: 2024-08-02T01:17:58.600Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2024-29902 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:33:29.517714 Cosign vulnerable to system-wide denial of service via malicious attachments
MEDIUM (4.2)
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, a remote image with a malicious attachment can cause denial of service of the host machine running Cosign. This can impact other services on the machine that rely on having memory available such as a Redis database which can result in data loss. It can also impact the availability of other services on the machine that will not be available for the duration of the machine denial. The root cause of this issue is that Cosign reads the attachment from a remote image entirely into memory without checking the size of the attachment first. As such, a large attachment can make Cosign read a large attachment into memory; If the attachments size is larger than the machine has memory available, the machine will be denied of service. The Go runtime will make a SigKill after a few seconds of system-wide denial. This issue can allow a supply-chain escalation from a compromised registry to the Cosign user: If an attacher has compromised a registry or the account of an image vendor, they can include a malicious attachment and hurt the image consumer. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.
Published: 2024-04-10T22:28:19.788Z
Updated: 2024-08-02T01:17:58.609Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-46737 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:14:23.082443 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2022-36056 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:46:06.228055 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2022-35929 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:46:05.997125 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2022-23649 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:40:58.121438 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

Contribute

You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.