E Series Santricity Management
Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:e-series_santricity_management:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
part: a version: - update: *
| Vendor | Netapp (f19678f6-cb27-5a55-8852-34b249f80ef9) |
|---|---|
| Product | E Series Santricity Management (2cde9b37-1df7-528a-841b-7e7a2875e9df) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
| Notes | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
| No PURL mappings for this CPE yet. | ||
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2017-7658 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:10:05.691913 |
Details available
In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization.
Published: 2018-06-26T17:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-05T16:12:27.826Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-7657 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:10:05.662476 |
Details available
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request.
Published: 2018-06-26T16:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-05T16:12:27.850Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.