Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:nlnet_labs:nsd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*part: a version: * update: *
| Vendor | Nlnet Labs (0c10f96c-93c5-5f8a-9565-16ce18fb699e) |
|---|---|
| Product | Nsd (0afc88e2-f5e2-53dc-9435-dbd406a78991) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
Notes
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
| No PURL mappings for this CPE yet. | ||
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2026-101341 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:22.782606 |
Stack overwrite from specially formatted TXT-DATA RDATA field
Tokens of text in RDATA (of for example TXT records) under 32 bytes are not checked to stay within the space reserved for the RDATA allowing for arbitrary sized out of bound stack writes, including an overwrite of a callback function pointer which is called directly after parse. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system).
Published: 2026-10-14T10:56:51.922Z
Updated: 2026-10-14T14:08:20.283Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-101337 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:22.719119 |
Stack overwrite from specially formatted base64 RDATA field
When base64 data is split up in pieces, of 3 character or less, tokens were incorrectly calculated to produce 0 bytes. This enables attackers to overwrite the stack with up to 64K of attacker controlled data. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such as for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system).
Published: 2026-10-14T10:56:15.073Z
Updated: 2026-10-14T14:09:58.370Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-101338 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:22.337693 |
Stack overwrite from a specially crafted and formatted SVCB or HTTPS RR
When a SVCB or HTTPS RR has filled the wire format RDATA up to the brim, another ECH parameter may overwrite the stack, and once beyond the limit, the base64 decoder can write attacker controlled data of unlimited size. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such as for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system).
Published: 2026-10-14T10:56:28.223Z
Updated: 2026-10-14T14:09:20.163Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-101339 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:22.249640 |
Stack overwrite from a specially crafted and formatted HIP RR
A HIP resource record that fills the RDATA near or at is limit, and has another dname RDATA field (a HIP Rendezvous server) can overwrite the stack with up to 191 bytes of attacker controlled data. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such as for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system).
Published: 2026-10-14T10:56:37.808Z
Updated: 2026-10-14T14:08:51.522Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-12490 |
vulnerable | 2026-07-29 00:23:32.371404 |
Bypass of client certificate verification with transfer over TLS
When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.
Published: 2026-06-25T05:24:41.814Z
Updated: 2026-06-25T12:41:18.144Z Reference links |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-12246 |
vulnerable | 2026-07-29 00:23:32.212262 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-12245 |
vulnerable | 2026-07-29 00:23:32.212100 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-12244 |
vulnerable | 2026-07-29 00:23:32.211801 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-28935 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:23:56.619211 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.
Inspect record JSON
Open this panel to browse, search, copy or download the JSON record.