Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom

cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty.project:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

part: a version: * update: *

VendorEclipse (fa988180-604e-5c1f-93ea-65b5297000fc)
ProductJetty.Project (c03b5c69-00eb-5636-87f2-9e412ed0f0cf)
Edition*
Language*
Software edition*
Target software*
Target hardware*
Other*
NotesImported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

PURL mappings

PURLSourceLast updated
No PURL mappings for this CPE yet.

Vulnerability references

IdentifiercpeApplicabilitySubmitteddb.gcve.eu detailsRationale
CVE:CVE-2023-41900 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:11:07.396677 Jetty's OpenId Revoked authentication allows one request
LOW (3.5)
Jetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. Versions 9.4.21 through 9.4.51, 10.0.15, and 11.0.15 are vulnerable to weak authentication. If a Jetty `OpenIdAuthenticator` uses the optional nested `LoginService`, and that `LoginService` decides to revoke an already authenticated user, then the current request will still treat the user as authenticated. The authentication is then cleared from the session and subsequent requests will not be treated as authenticated. So a request on a previously authenticated session could be allowed to bypass authentication after it had been rejected by the `LoginService`. This impacts usages of the jetty-openid which have configured a nested `LoginService` and where that `LoginService` will is capable of rejecting previously authenticated users. Versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, and 11.0.16 have a patch for this issue.
Published: 2023-09-15T20:17:42.201Z
Updated: 2025-02-13T17:09:04.719Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-40167 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:09:41.350601 Jetty accepts "+" prefixed value in Content-Length
MEDIUM (5.3)
Jetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. Prior to versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1, Jetty accepts the `+` character proceeding the content-length value in a HTTP/1 header field. This is more permissive than allowed by the RFC and other servers routinely reject such requests with 400 responses. There is no known exploit scenario, but it is conceivable that request smuggling could result if jetty is used in combination with a server that does not close the connection after sending such a 400 response. Versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1 contain a patch for this issue. There is no workaround as there is no known exploit scenario.
Published: 2023-09-15T19:37:37.530Z
Updated: 2025-02-13T17:03:25.096Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-36479 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:08:11.976410 Jetty vulnerable to errant command quoting in CGI Servlet
LOW (3.5)
Eclipse Jetty Canonical Repository is the canonical repository for the Jetty project. Users of the CgiServlet with a very specific command structure may have the wrong command executed. If a user sends a request to a org.eclipse.jetty.servlets.CGI Servlet for a binary with a space in its name, the servlet will escape the command by wrapping it in quotation marks. This wrapped command, plus an optional command prefix, will then be executed through a call to Runtime.exec. If the original binary name provided by the user contains a quotation mark followed by a space, the resulting command line will contain multiple tokens instead of one. This issue was patched in version 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16 and 12.0.0-beta2.
Published: 2023-09-15T18:37:35.948Z
Updated: 2025-06-18T14:41:11.113Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-36478 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:08:11.969959 HTTP/2 HPACK integer overflow and buffer allocation
HIGH (7.5)
Eclipse Jetty provides a web server and servlet container. In versions 11.0.0 through 11.0.15, 10.0.0 through 10.0.15, and 9.0.0 through 9.4.52, an integer overflow in `MetaDataBuilder.checkSize` allows for HTTP/2 HPACK header values to exceed their size limit. `MetaDataBuilder.java` determines if a header name or value exceeds the size limit, and throws an exception if the limit is exceeded. However, when length is very large and huffman is true, the multiplication by 4 in line 295 will overflow, and length will become negative. `(_size+length)` will now be negative, and the check on line 296 will not be triggered. Furthermore, `MetaDataBuilder.checkSize` allows for user-entered HPACK header value sizes to be negative, potentially leading to a very large buffer allocation later on when the user-entered size is multiplied by 2. This means that if a user provides a negative length value (or, more precisely, a length value which, when multiplied by the 4/3 fudge factor, is negative), and this length value is a very large positive number when multiplied by 2, then the user can cause a very large buffer to be allocated on the server. Users of HTTP/2 can be impacted by a remote denial of service attack. The issue has been fixed in versions 11.0.16, 10.0.16, and 9.4.53. There are no known workarounds.
Published: 2023-10-10T16:53:07.063Z
Updated: 2025-02-13T16:56:19.080Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-26049 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:57:37.926239 Cookie parsing of quoted values can exfiltrate values from other cookies in Eclipse Jetty
LOW (2.4)
Jetty is a java based web server and servlet engine. Nonstandard cookie parsing in Jetty may allow an attacker to smuggle cookies within other cookies, or otherwise perform unintended behavior by tampering with the cookie parsing mechanism. If Jetty sees a cookie VALUE that starts with `"` (double quote), it will continue to read the cookie string until it sees a closing quote -- even if a semicolon is encountered. So, a cookie header such as: `DISPLAY_LANGUAGE="b; JSESSIONID=1337; c=d"` will be parsed as one cookie, with the name DISPLAY_LANGUAGE and a value of b; JSESSIONID=1337; c=d instead of 3 separate cookies. This has security implications because if, say, JSESSIONID is an HttpOnly cookie, and the DISPLAY_LANGUAGE cookie value is rendered on the page, an attacker can smuggle the JSESSIONID cookie into the DISPLAY_LANGUAGE cookie and thereby exfiltrate it. This is significant when an intermediary is enacting some policy based on cookies, so a smuggled cookie can bypass that policy yet still be seen by the Jetty server or its logging system. This issue has been addressed in versions 9.4.51, 10.0.14, 11.0.14, and 12.0.0.beta0 and users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.
Published: 2023-04-18T20:35:36.506Z
Updated: 2025-02-13T16:44:44.710Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-26048 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:57:37.925007 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

Contribute

You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.