Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:eclipse_foundation:netx_duo:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*part: a version: * update: *
| Vendor | Eclipse Foundation (2c315c48-0111-5572-bbde-cc70cfafb2e9) |
|---|---|
| Product | Netx Duo (5f907719-83aa-5a38-be7f-bee7a93fd941) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
Notes
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
| No PURL mappings for this CPE yet. | ||
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2026-106465 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:59:43.836601 |
Missing HelloVerifyRequest cookie validation in the NetX Secure DTLS server
In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo versions 6.0 through 6.5.2.202603, the NetX Secure DTLS server never compares the cookie a client returns with the one it issued, and treats any non-empty cookie as verified. A remote attacker can make the server send its full handshake flight, several kilobytes, to a forged source address, using it to reflect amplified traffic at a third party.
Published: 2026-10-14T17:47:11.013Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T13:23:55.487Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-106464 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:59:43.673914 |
Out-of-bounds read via an empty signature BIT STRING in NetX Secure X.509 parsing
In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo versions up to and including 6.5.2.202603, the NetX Secure X.509 parser accepts a certificate whose signature is an empty BIT STRING and records a signature length of 0xFFFFFFFF. A remote peer can present such a certificate during the TLS handshake, before authentication, and make the device read far outside the certificate buffer during signature verification, which is expected to fault.
Published: 2026-10-14T17:41:43.585Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T13:20:59.238Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102714 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:59:30.359445 |
ICMPv6 option validation accepts a trailing byte residue, sending the Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, Neighbor Advertisement and Redirect option walkers past the packet or into a permanent loop
In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo versions up to and including 6.5.2.202603, built with IPv6, the ICMPv6 option validator accepts an option area that ends in a one- or two-byte residue, and the Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, Neighbor Advertisement and Redirect handlers then walk it without length checks. A host on the local link can send one such message to make the IP thread read past the packet or loop forever, and can place off-packet memory in the neighbor cache.
Published: 2026-09-29T17:41:28.517Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T13:06:47.699Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102718 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:59:30.265310 |
Out-of-bounds read in the NetX Duo SNMP OID parser via a multi-byte BER length
In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo versions up to and including 6.5.2.202603, the SNMP agent's OID parser uses a multi-byte BER length from the request without checking it against the bytes present, and reads past the end of the packet buffer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted SNMP request that makes the agent read adjacent memory into its OID state, faulting the agent on targets with memory protection.
Published: 2026-09-29T17:44:43.914Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T13:18:33.678Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102725 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.655835 |
Out-of-bounds Read from Unvalidated MSRP Attribute List Length
In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo versions 6.4.0 through 6.5.2.202603a, built with VLAN and SRP support, the MSRP parser uses the attribute list length from the received frame without comparing it with the packet length. An unauthenticated station on the same Layer 2 segment can send a short MSRP frame declaring a long list and make the MRP worker read far past the received packet, faulting it on targets with memory protection.
Published: 2026-09-29T17:51:03.858Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T10:31:53.318Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102721 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.625707 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102728 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.542305 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102724 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.510081 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102726 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.378663 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102722 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.359362 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102713 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.345189 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102727 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.326284 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102723 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.303133 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-102712 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-04 14:24:25.286520 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55096 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.056770 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55094 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.052838 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55093 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.052555 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55092 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.052139 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55091 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.051726 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55090 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.051144 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55085 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.045821 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55084 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.045540 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55083 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.045247 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55082 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.044926 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2025-55081 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 07:33:14.043959 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.
Inspect record JSON
Open this panel to browse, search, copy or download the JSON record.