NetApp Data ONTAP Edge
Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:data_ontap_edge:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
part: a version: - update: *
| Vendor | Netapp (f19678f6-cb27-5a55-8852-34b249f80ef9) |
|---|---|
| Product | Data Ontap Edge (2cb1af22-10d4-58bc-983c-7a949ecfbf91) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
| Notes | Imported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed |
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
| No PURL mappings for this CPE yet. | ||
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2018-6485 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:11:53.792577 |
Details available
An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption.
Published: 2018-02-01T14:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-05T06:01:49.264Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-5740 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:11:51.744458 |
A flaw in the "deny-answer-aliases" feature can cause an assertion failure in named
HIGH (7.5)
"deny-answer-aliases" is a little-used feature intended to help recursive server operators protect end users against DNS rebinding attacks, a potential method of circumventing the security model used by client browsers. However, a defect in this feature makes it easy, when the feature is in use, to experience an assertion failure in name.c. Affects BIND 9.7.0->9.8.8, 9.9.0->9.9.13, 9.10.0->9.10.8, 9.11.0->9.11.4, 9.12.0->9.12.2, 9.13.0->9.13.2.
Published: 2019-01-16T20:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T17:58:43.029Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-5737 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:11:51.728499 |
BIND 9.12's serve-stale implementation can cause an assertion failure in rbtdb.c or other undesirable behavior, even if serve-stale is not enabled.
MEDIUM (5.9)
A problem with the implementation of the new serve-stale feature in BIND 9.12 can lead to an assertion failure in rbtdb.c, even when stale-answer-enable is off. Additionally, problematic interaction between the serve-stale feature and NSEC aggressive negative caching can in some cases cause undesirable behavior from named, such as a recursion loop or excessive logging. Deliberate exploitation of this condition could cause operational problems depending on the particular manifestation -- either degradation or denial of service. Affects BIND 9.12.0 and 9.12.1.
Published: 2019-01-16T20:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T22:40:22.628Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-5736 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:11:51.727915 |
Details available
An error in zone database reference counting can lead to an assertion failure if a server which is running an affected version of BIND attempts several transfers of a slave zone in quick succession. This defect could be deliberately exercised by an attacker who is permitted to cause a vulnerable server to initiate zone transfers (for example: by sending valid NOTIFY messages), causing the named process to exit after failing the assertion test. Affects BIND 9.12.0 and 9.12.1.
Published: 2019-01-16T20:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-05T05:40:51.229Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-5734 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:11:51.722384 |
A malformed request can trigger an assertion failure in badcache.c
HIGH (7.5)
While handling a particular type of malformed packet BIND erroneously selects a SERVFAIL rcode instead of a FORMERR rcode. If the receiving view has the SERVFAIL cache feature enabled, this can trigger an assertion failure in badcache.c when the request doesn't contain all of the expected information. Affects BIND 9.10.5-S1 to 9.10.5-S4, 9.10.6-S1, 9.10.6-S2.
Published: 2019-01-16T20:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-09-17T02:31:46.321Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-15919 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:11:03.811445 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-15473 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:10:54.514168 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-12015 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:10:39.712726 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-11237 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:10:38.028955 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2018-11236 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:10:38.027107 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3145 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:26.647360 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3140 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:26.600672 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3138 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:26.594164 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3137 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:26.581170 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3136 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:26.564691 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-3135 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:09:26.552111 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2017-15906 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:59.692881 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-9778 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:24.494739 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-9131 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:22.641862 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-8864 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:21.958918 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-8610 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:08:14.447530 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2016-10708 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:25.608511 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2015-8960 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:07:05.790450 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.