Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom

cpe:2.3:a:nimiq:nimiq-transaction:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

part: a version: * update: *

VendorNimiq (a6c6d398-2780-5e77-a82f-ca37478d870d)
ProductNimiq Transaction (0fef3237-c480-5d70-a7e6-b1c2d8929638)
Edition*
Language*
Software edition*
Target software*
Target hardware*
Other*
NotesImported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

PURL mappings

PURLSourceLast updated
No PURL mappings for this CPE yet.

Vulnerability references

IdentifiercpeApplicabilitySubmitteddb.gcve.eu detailsRationale
CVE:CVE-2026-34068 vulnerable 2026-06-08 07:59:11.734249 nimiq-transaction: UpdateValidator transactions allows voting key change without proof-of-knowledge
MEDIUM (6.8)
nimiq-transaction provides the transaction primitive to be used in Nimiq's Rust implementation. Prior to version 1.3.0, the staking contract accepts `UpdateValidator` transactions that set `new_voting_key=Some(...)` while omitting `new_proof_of_knowledge`. this skips the proof-of-knowledge requirement that is needed to prevent BLS rogue-key attacks when public keys are aggregated. Because tendermint macro block justification verification aggregates validator voting keys and verifies a single aggregated BLS signature against that aggregate public key, a rogue-key voting key in the validator set can allow an attacker to forge a quorum-looking justification while only producing a single signature. While the impact is critical, the exploitability is low: The voting keys are fixed for the epoch, so the attacker would need to know the next epoch validator set (chosen through VRF), which is unlikely. The patch for this vulnerability is included as part of v1.3.0. No known workarounds are available.
Published: 2026-04-22T19:55:08.219Z
Updated: 2026-04-23T12:56:27.980Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2026-34067 vulnerable 2026-06-08 07:59:11.733782 nimiq-transaction vulnerable to panic via `HistoryTreeProof` length mismatch
LOW (3.1)
nimiq-transaction provides the transaction primitive to be used in Nimiq's Rust implementation. Prior to version 1.3.0, `HistoryTreeProof::verify` panics on a malformed proof where `history.len() != positions.len()` due to `assert_eq!(history.len(), positions.len())`. The proof object is derived from untrusted p2p responses (`ResponseTransactionsProof.proof`) and is therefore attacker-controlled at the network boundary until validated. A malicious peer could trigger a crash by returning a crafted inclusion proof with a length mismatch. The patch for this vulnerability is included as part of v1.3.0. No known workarounds are available.
Published: 2026-04-22T19:52:43.916Z
Updated: 2026-04-23T14:17:59.735Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

Contribute

You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.