Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:esaqa_gmbh:psono:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*part: a version: * update: *
| Vendor | Esaqa Gmbh (402c3661-a261-5de1-9d11-71a70cff2602) |
|---|---|
| Product | Psono (423e4044-8835-58f7-9e36-0dbea3e4926d) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
Notes
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
| No PURL mappings for this CPE yet. | ||
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2026-117469 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:34.302512 |
File-transfer type confusion permits unauthorized repository writes in Psono Server
MEDIUM (5.4)
Psono Server (CE & EE) versions 1.0.0 through 7.2.3 did not enforce the direction of file-transfer credentials on file-repository operations. An authenticated remote attacker with read-only access to a file could present a download transfer to the upload endpoint, obtain a signed upload URL for an attacker-selected object key, and append a chunk to the owner's file. Exploitation could upload or overwrite repository objects and consume storage, subject to transfer size, chunk-count, and lifetime limits.
Published: 2026-10-27T05:52:24.709Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T15:01:37.599Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-117471 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:34.300316 |
User-controlled Duo host permits authenticated SSRF in Psono Server
MEDIUM (5.4)
Psono Server CE && EE versions 0.1.0 through 7.2.3 accepted a user-controlled host when configuring a personal Duo device and passed it to the Duo client without an allowlist or explicit timeout. An authenticated remote attacker could cause the server to connect to selected hosts over HTTPS on port 443 and distinguish failure modes, providing an internal DNS and service-reachability oracle. Connections still required TLS certificate validation, and the flaw did not provide arbitrary protocol or port access. Unresponsive targets could also occupy a server worker until the operating-system timeout.
Published: 2026-10-27T05:55:07.068Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T15:01:19.922Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-117468 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:34.267265 |
Device-code claim permits restricted token escalation in Psono Server
MEDIUM (6.5)
Psono Server versions 5.3.5 through 7.2.3 used a permission class that did not enforce token write scope when claiming a device code. An authenticated remote attacker holding a restricted API key-derived session could claim an attacker-controlled device code and obtain a full read-write session valid for up to 365 days, bypassing the original token's scope and lifetime restrictions. This did not bypass two-factor authentication or directly disclose plaintext secrets.
Published: 2026-10-27T05:41:30.742Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T15:01:45.819Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-117470 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:34.263294 |
WebAuthn assertion replay permits second-factor bypass in Psono Server
MEDIUM (6.5)
Psono Server CE & EE versions 3.1.0 through 7.2.3 did not consume a stored WebAuthn challenge after assertion verification. An unauthenticated remote attacker who possessed the user's password and one captured valid WebAuthn assertion could replay that assertion with separate login tokens while the stored challenge remained unchanged, bypassing the WebAuthn second factor. The attack required capture of a valid assertion and did not itself disclose plaintext secrets.
Published: 2026-10-27T05:53:41.709Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T15:01:28.290Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2026-117472 |
vulnerable | 2026-11-03 10:15:33.589833 |
URL prefix handling permits API key read-scope bypass in Psono Server
MEDIUM (4.3)
Psono Server CE && EE versions 4.0.33 through 7.2.3 compared the request path for the bulk-secret-read endpoint with a hard-coded unprefixed path. In deployments configured with URL_PREFIX, the comparison failed and the POST request was authorized using write scope instead of read scope. An authenticated remote attacker with an unusual read-disabled, write-enabled API key could therefore retrieve encrypted secret data and nonces through the prefixed bulk-secret-read endpoint despite lacking read permission. The default configuration without URL_PREFIX was not affected.
Published: 2026-10-27T05:56:16.775Z
Updated: 2026-11-04T15:01:13.544Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.
Inspect record JSON
Open this panel to browse, search, copy or download the JSON record.