Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom

cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

part: a version: 7.0.0 update: *

VendorRedhat (e942785a-ca89-506e-bd99-50782639cde3)
ProductJboss Fuse (c344dd06-29b6-50ba-9280-fd87f5ddd3a3)
Edition*
Language*
Software edition*
Target software*
Target hardware*
Other*
NotesImported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed

PURL mappings

PURLSourceLast updated
pkg:github/jboss-fuse/redhat-fuse purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:12:55.669703
pkg:gitlab/redhat/fuse purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:12:55.669705

Vulnerability references

IdentifiercpeApplicabilitySubmitteddb.gcve.eu detailsRationale
CVE:CVE-2024-7885 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:58:23.811941 Undertow: improper state management in proxy protocol parsing causes information leakage
HIGH (7.5)
A vulnerability was found in Undertow where the ProxyProtocolReadListener reuses the same StringBuilder instance across multiple requests. This issue occurs when the parseProxyProtocolV1 method processes multiple requests on the same HTTP connection. As a result, different requests may share the same StringBuilder instance, potentially leading to information leakage between requests or responses. In some cases, a value from a previous request or response may be erroneously reused, which could lead to unintended data exposure. This issue primarily results in errors and connection termination but creates a risk of data leakage in multi-request environments.
Published: 2024-08-21T14:13:36.579Z
Updated: 2026-01-19T03:51:37.166Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2023-44487 vulnerable 2026-06-08 06:12:41.229304 Details available
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
Published: 2023-10-10T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2026-07-14T12:03:17.389Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2022-4492 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:51:59.609224 Details available
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
Published: 2023-02-23T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-03-12T14:34:50.123Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2022-2764 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:43:36.426484 Details available
A flaw was found in Undertow. Denial of service can be achieved as Undertow server waits for the LAST_CHUNK forever for EJB invocations.
Published: 2022-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-03T00:46:04.429Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2022-2053 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:42:50.164944 Details available
When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2.
Published: 2022-08-05T15:24:27.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-03T00:24:44.066Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2021-4104 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:38:08.353030 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2021-3642 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:33:53.267726 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2021-20218 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:29:08.731609 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-27782 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:23:53.180352 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-25689 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:22:37.207466 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-25644 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:22:37.009282 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-1757 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:21:02.983850 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-1718 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:21:02.875567 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-1717 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:21:02.875117 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-1714 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:21:02.869037 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-14340 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:19:23.041241 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-10734 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:16:35.773073 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-10718 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:16:35.726756 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-10714 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:16:35.718324 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2019-14892 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:12:56.364651 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2019-14888 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:12:56.351139 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2019-14887 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:12:56.344398 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2019-14820 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:12:56.145150 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2019-10172 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:12:22.403673 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

Contribute

You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.