Red Hat JBoss Fuse 7.0.0
Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom
cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
part: a version: 7.0.0 update: *
| Vendor | Redhat (e942785a-ca89-506e-bd99-50782639cde3) |
|---|---|
| Product | Jboss Fuse (c344dd06-29b6-50ba-9280-fd87f5ddd3a3) |
| Edition | * |
| Language | * |
| Software edition | * |
| Target software | * |
| Target hardware | * |
| Other | * |
| Notes | Imported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed |
PURL mappings
| PURL | Source | Last updated |
|---|---|---|
pkg:github/jboss-fuse/redhat-fuse |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:12:55.669703 |
pkg:gitlab/redhat/fuse |
purl2cpe | 2026-06-01 10:12:55.669705 |
Vulnerability references
| Identifier | cpeApplicability | Submitted | db.gcve.eu details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE:CVE-2024-7885 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 06:58:23.811941 |
Undertow: improper state management in proxy protocol parsing causes information leakage
HIGH (7.5)
A vulnerability was found in Undertow where the ProxyProtocolReadListener reuses the same StringBuilder instance across multiple requests. This issue occurs when the parseProxyProtocolV1 method processes multiple requests on the same HTTP connection. As a result, different requests may share the same StringBuilder instance, potentially leading to information leakage between requests or responses. In some cases, a value from a previous request or response may be erroneously reused, which could lead to unintended data exposure. This issue primarily results in errors and connection termination but creates a risk of data leakage in multi-request environments.
Published: 2024-08-21T14:13:36.579Z
Updated: 2026-01-19T03:51:37.166Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2023-44487 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 06:12:41.229304 |
Details available
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
Published: 2023-10-10T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2026-07-14T12:03:17.389Z Reference links
|
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2022-4492 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:51:59.609224 |
Details available
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
Published: 2023-02-23T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-03-12T14:34:50.123Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2022-2764 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:43:36.426484 |
Details available
A flaw was found in Undertow. Denial of service can be achieved as Undertow server waits for the LAST_CHUNK forever for EJB invocations.
Published: 2022-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-03T00:46:04.429Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2022-2053 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:42:50.164944 |
Details available
When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2.
Published: 2022-08-05T15:24:27.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-03T00:24:44.066Z |
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2021-4104 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:38:08.353030 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2021-3642 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:33:53.267726 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2021-20218 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:29:08.731609 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-27782 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:23:53.180352 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25689 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.207466 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-25644 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:22:37.009282 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-1757 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:21:02.983850 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-1718 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:21:02.875567 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-1717 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:21:02.875117 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-1714 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:21:02.869037 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-14340 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:19:23.041241 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-10734 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:16:35.773073 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-10718 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:16:35.726756 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2020-10714 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:16:35.718324 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2019-14892 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:12:56.364651 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2019-14888 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:12:56.351139 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2019-14887 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:12:56.344398 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2019-14820 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:12:56.145150 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
CVE:CVE-2019-10172 |
vulnerable | 2026-06-08 05:12:22.403673 | db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. | Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data |
Contribute
You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.