Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom

cpe:2.3:a:dronecode:micro_air_vehicle_link:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

part: a version: 1.0.0 update: *

VendorDronecode (a352f474-21c4-51fa-abb1-194973651123)
ProductMicro Air Vehicle Link (ba3eecdf-2120-5a02-997d-b444184e12fb)
Edition*
Language*
Software edition*
Target software*
Target hardware*
Other*
NotesImported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed

PURL mappings

PURLSourceLast updated
pkg:github/mavlink/mavlink purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:16:54.628555

Vulnerability references

IdentifiercpeApplicabilitySubmitteddb.gcve.eu detailsRationale
CVE:CVE-2020-10283 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:16:35.109011 RVD#3317: MAVLink version handshaking allows for an attacker to bypass authentication
HIGH (8.1)
The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents authentication mechanisms on its version 2.0 however according to its documentation, in order to maintain backwards compatibility, GCS and autopilot negotiate the version via the AUTOPILOT_VERSION message. Since this negotiation depends on the answer, an attacker may craft packages in a way that hints the autopilot to adopt version 1.0 of MAVLink for the communication. Given the lack of authentication capabilities in such version of MAVLink (refer to CVE-2020-10282), attackers may use this method to bypass authentication capabilities and interact with the autopilot directly.
Published: 2020-08-20T08:15:13.054Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T17:08:41.099Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2020-10282 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:16:35.107699 RVD#3316: No authentication in MAVLink protocol
CRITICAL (9.8)
The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents no authentication mechanism on its version 1.0 (nor authorization) whichs leads to a variety of attacks including identity spoofing, unauthorized access, PITM attacks and more. According to literature, version 2.0 optionally allows for package signing which mitigates this flaw. Another source mentions that MAVLink 2.0 only provides a simple authentication system based on HMAC. This implies that the flying system overall should add the same symmetric key into all devices of network. If not the case, this may cause a security issue, that if one of the devices and its symmetric key are compromised, the whole authentication system is not reliable.
Published: 2020-07-03T14:30:15.587Z
Updated: 2024-09-16T17:22:38.711Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

Contribute

You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.