Approved changes feed: RSS · Atom

cpe:2.3:a:vmware:spring_framework:3.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

part: a version: 3.2.3 update: *

VendorVmware (7bb62c7c-2241-5a0b-8dbc-5f13251fb24e)
ProductSpring Framework (41621cc5-d045-5d17-9682-c6f08d8595d7)
Edition*
Language*
Software edition*
Target software*
Target hardware*
Other*
NotesImported from NVD CPE 2.0 feed

PURL mappings

PURLSourceLast updated
pkg:bitbucket/whyoung/spring-framework purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:12:21.584330
pkg:github/spring-projects/spring-framework purl2cpe 2026-06-01 10:12:21.584331

Vulnerability references

IdentifiercpeApplicabilitySubmitteddb.gcve.eu detailsRationale
CVE:CVE-2016-9878 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:08:24.880023 Details available
An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.18, 4.2.x before 4.2.9, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5. Paths provided to the ResourceServlet were not properly sanitized and as a result exposed to directory traversal attacks.
Published: 2016-12-29T09:02:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-06T03:07:30.827Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2016-5007 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:07:55.938621 Details available
Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences.
Published: 2017-05-25T17:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-06T00:46:40.202Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2015-5211 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:06:49.236791 Details available
Under some situations, the Spring Framework 4.2.0 to 4.2.1, 4.0.0 to 4.1.7, 3.2.0 to 3.2.14 and older unsupported versions is vulnerable to a Reflected File Download (RFD) attack. The attack involves a malicious user crafting a URL with a batch script extension that results in the response being downloaded rather than rendered and also includes some input reflected in the response.
Published: 2017-05-25T17:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-06T06:41:08.706Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2015-3192 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:06:37.474869 Details available
Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.14 and 4.x before 4.1.7 do not properly process inline DTD declarations when DTD is not entirely disabled, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and out-of-memory errors) via a crafted XML file.
Published: 2016-07-12T19:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-06T05:39:31.943Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2014-0225 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:05:12.340909 Details available
When processing user provided XML documents, the Spring Framework 4.0.0 to 4.0.4, 3.0.0 to 3.2.8, and possibly earlier unsupported versions did not disable by default the resolution of URI references in a DTD declaration. This enabled an XXE attack.
Published: 2017-05-25T17:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2024-08-06T09:05:39.298Z
Reference links
Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data
CVE:CVE-2014-0054 vulnerable 2026-06-08 05:05:11.010718 db.gcve.eu details were skipped to keep the page responsive. Imported from gcve-enriched-dumps CVE data

Contribute

You can submit an edit proposal for this CPE entry or suggest a related product/vendor addition using the action button above.